Is Wall Street's Relationship with the S&P 500 Parasitic?

The S&P 500 has seen a surge in average annual returns, rising from around 6% in the 1960’s and 1970’s to over 20% recently. Yet, the average lifespan of companies listed on the S&P 500 has plummeted, from 67 years to just 15 years or less. This paradox raises a critical question: Is being in the S&P 500 bad for business?

The Alarming Decline of S&P 500 Company Lifespans

• In 1965, the average lifespan of a company on the S&P 500 was 67 years. Today, that number has shrunk to just 15 years and is projected to be even shorter by 2030.
• A staggering 50% of S&P 500 companies are expected to be replaced over the next decade, according to research by Innosight. This churn rate is unprecedented and reveals a disturbing trend about the long-term health of publicly traded companies.

💡 Did you know? The longest-standing company on the S&P 500 today, Procter & Gamble, has survived on the list for over 65 years—an exception rather than the norm.

Private vs. Public: A Stark Contrast in Longevity

Compare the S&P 500 lifespan with large, privately held companies:

• Cargill (established in 1865) is still thriving with over $165 billion in revenue.
• Koch Industries generates over $125 billion annually and has been around since 1940.
• Mars Inc., a family-owned business, has survived for over a century and continues to innovate with global brands like M&M’s and Pedigree.
• Publix, founded in 1930, has grown into a behemoth with $54 billion in sales without the pressures of Wall Street.

These private giants have consistently focused on reinvestment, long-term growth, and innovation, proving that companies outside of Wall Street’s influence can thrive for generations.

💡 Popout Insight: The average age of the top 25 private companies in the U.S. is over 90 years, while the average age of S&P 500 companies is just 15 years!

The Public Market Trap: Perverse Incentives Driving Short-Termism

1. Quarterly Earnings Pressure

Public companies must report earnings every quarter, driving short-term thinking and creating a “meet or beat” culture. This results in:

• 73% of U.S. CFOs admitting they would take actions that harm long-term value to meet short-term targets, according to a survey by the National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Over 50% of companies admitting they’ve cut R&D spending to make quarterly numbers.

2. Stock Buybacks Over Innovation

In 2021 alone, S&P 500 companies spent over $882 billion on stock buybacks, compared to $196 billion in R&D spending. This trend points to a preference for short-term stock price boosts rather than investing in long-term growth.

Example: Apple spent over $90 billion on buybacks in 2021—nearly double its R&D expenditure. While this has helped its stock price soar, questions linger about the opportunity cost of these funds.

3. Activist Investors and Short-Term Agendas

Activist investors often force companies to adopt strategies that maximize immediate shareholder value, often at the expense of long-term stability. For example:

• In 2013, Carl Icahn pressured Apple to increase buybacks, resulting in a staggering increase in share repurchases but little additional investment in long-term projects.
• A 2019 study found that activist-led companies see a 36% reduction in R&D spending over five years.

💡 Popout Insight: Short-term pressures have led to a 60% increase in the CEO turnover rate in public companies compared to private firms, signaling instability and disruption.

Public Markets: A Hotbed for Boom and Bust Cycles

Historically, public companies are more vulnerable to economic downturns. During the 2008 financial crisis, the S&P 500 lost 38% of its value, and many companies that couldn’t withstand the pressure disappeared. In contrast, privately held companies like Cargill thrived, reporting record earnings in 2008 due to their ability to make strategic, long-term decisions without Wall Street’s scrutiny.

The Real Cost: Missing Out on Long-Term Success

A comparison of publicly traded companies that went private:

• Dell Technologies: After going private in 2013, it invested heavily in R&D and made a successful return to the public market in 2018 with a more sustainable growth strategy.
• Heinz: Taken private in 2013, the company streamlined operations, expanded into emerging markets, and ultimately merged with Kraft to form a stronger, more resilient brand.

💡 Popout Insight: Research by Bain & Company shows that private companies grow 35% faster than their public counterparts over the long term.

Conclusion: Wall Street's Parasitic Nature

Wall Street's influence often pushes public companies into short-term thinking, which can be toxic for long-term health. Stock buybacks, quarterly pressures, and activist investor agendas have eroded the foundation of sustainable growth for many businesses on the S&P 500.

To counter this, it's crucial to develop incentive structures that reward companies, executives, and employees for long-term success, innovation, and resilience. This could mean redefining success metrics beyond quarterly earnings, fostering investment in R&D, and promoting corporate cultures that value long-term vision over short-term gains.

The Bottom Line: It’s time to rethink how we measure and value success in the public markets. Sustainable business growth should be our gold standard—not Wall Street’s quarterly approval

‍